For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E. M., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
Boehm, U., van Maanen, L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A theoretical analysis of the reward rate optimality of collapsing decision criteria. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82, 1520-1534. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01806-4
Evans, N. J., Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Maas, H. L. J. V. D. (2020). Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 121, [101292]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101292[details]
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920919667[details]
Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience, 23(7), 788-799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4[details]
Landy, J. F., Jia, M. L., Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146(5), 451-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000220
Ly, A., Stefan, A., van Doorn, J., Dablander, F., van den Bergh, D., Sarafoglou, A., Kucharský, S., Derks, K., Gronau, Q. F., Raj, A., Boehm, U., van Kesteren, E-J., Hinne, M., Matzke, D., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). The Bayesian Methodology of Sir Harold Jeffreys as a Practical Alternative to the P Value Hypothesis Test. Computational Brain & Behavior, 3(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dhb7x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00070-x[details]
Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Teaching Good Research Practices: Protocol of a Research Master Course. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719858807[details]
Stefan, A. M., Evans, N. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Practical challenges and methodological flexibility in prior elicitation. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000354
van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Bayesian rank-based hypothesis testing for the rank sum test, the signed rank test, and Spearman’s ρ. Journal of Applied Statistics, 47(16), 2984-3006. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1709053[details]
van Doorn, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). An In-Class Demonstration of Bayesian Inference. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719848574[details]
van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J., Marsman, M., Draws, T., van Kesteren, E-J., Derks, K., Dablander, F., Gronau, Q. F., Kucharský, Š., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Voelkel, J. G., Stefan, A., Ly, A., Hinne, M., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. L' année psychologique, 120(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/spreb, https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.201.0073[details]
2019
Dahrendorf, M., Hoffmann, T., Mittenbühler, M., Wiechert, S., Sarafoglou, A. S. G., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2019). "Because it is the Right Thing to Do'': Taking Stock of the Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative. Journal of European Psychology Students, 11(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h39jt, https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.506
Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E-J., Heck, D. W., & Matzke, D. (2019). A simple method for comparing complex models: Bayesian model comparison for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models using Warp-III bridge sampling. Psychometrika, 84(1), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9648-3[details]
Heck, D. W., Overstall, A. M., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models. Statistics and Computing, 29(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-018-9828-0[details]
Selker, R., van den Bergh, D., Criss, A. H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Parsimonious estimation of signal detection models from confidence ratings. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 1953-1967. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01231-3[details]
Stefan, A. M., Gronau, Q. F., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). A tutorial on Bayes Factor Design Analysis using an informed prior. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01189-8[details]
Wagenmakers, E. M., Lee, M., Rouder, J., & Morey, R. (Accepted/In press). The Principle of Predictive Irrelevance, or Why Intervals Should Not be Used for Model Comparison Featuring a Point Null Hypothesis. In C. Gruber (Ed.), The Theory of Statistics in Psychology: Applications, Use and Misunderstandings (Annals of Theoretical Psychology). Springer. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rqnu5
van Dongen, N. N. N., van Doorn, J. B., Gronau, Q. F., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Hoekstra, R., Haucke, M. N., ... Wagenmakers, E. J. (2019). Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios. American Statistician, 73(S1), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1565553[details]
van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Bayesian estimation of Kendall’s τ using a latent normal approach. Statistics and Probability Letters, 145, 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2018.10.004[details]
Aczel, B., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A., Kovacs, M., Szaszi, B., Szecsi, P., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918773742[details]
Beek, T. F., Matzke, D., Pinto, Y., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., Steingroever, H., Jostmann, N. B., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Incidental Haptic Sensations May Not Influence Social Judgments: A Purely Confirmatory Replication Attempt of Study 1 by Ackerman, Nocera, and Bargh (2010). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 14(2), 69-90. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=132351143&site=ehost-live&scope=site[details]
Boehm, U., Annis, J., Frank, M. J., Hawkins, G. E., Heathcote, A., Kellen, D., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the Diffusion Decision Model: Expert advice and recommendations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 46-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.09.004[details]
Boehm, U., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1614-1631. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1054-3[details]
Boehm, U., Steingroever, H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Using Bayesian regression to test hypotheses about relationships between parameters and covariates in cognitive models. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1248–1269. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0940-4[details]
Camerer, C., Dreber Almenberg, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., ... Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z[details]
Derks, K., Burger, J., van Doorn, J., Kossakowski, J. J., Matzke, D., Atticciati, L., Beitner, J., Benzesin, V., de Bruijn, A. L., Cohen, T. R. H., Cordesius, E. P. A., van Dekken, M., Delvendahl, N., Dobbelaar, S., Groenendijk, E. R., Hermans, M. E., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Hoffmann, A. M., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Network Models to Organize a Dispersed Literature: The Case of Misunderstanding Analysis of Covariance. Journal of European Psychology Students, 9, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.458[details]
Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian Evidence Accumulation in Experimental Mathematics: A Case Study of Four Irrational Numbers. Experimental Mathematics, 27(3), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2016.1256006[details]
Hoekstra, R., Monden, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian reanalysis of null results reported in medicine Strong yet variable evidence for the absence of treatment effects. PLoS ONE, 13(4), [e0195474]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195474[details]
Hoogeveen, S., Wagenmakers, E-J., Kay, A. C., & Van Elk, M. (2018). Compensatory control and religious beliefs: A registered replication report across two countries. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 240-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684821[details]
Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886[details]
Hu, C-P., Kong, X-Z., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ly, A., & Peng, K. (2018). The Bayes factor and its implementation in JASP: A practical primer. Xinli kexue jinzhan, 26(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00951[details]
Ly, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2018). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x
Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistica Neerlandica, 72(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12111[details]
Ly, A., Raj, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian reanalyses from summary statistics: A guide for academic consumers. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918779348[details]
Meindertsma, T., Kloosterman, N. A., Engel, A. K., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Donner, T. H. (2018). Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(35), 7600-7610. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-18.2018[details]
Monden, R., Roest, A. M., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Morey, R., Wardenaar, K. J., & de Jonge, P. (2018). The comparative evidence basis for the efficacy of second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of depression in the US: A Bayesian meta-analysis of Food and Drug Administration reviews. Journal of Affective Disorders, 235, 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.040[details]
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). In Vivo: Likelihood: A halfway house? In S. Farrell, & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Computational Modeling of Cognition and Behaviour (pp. 103-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316272503.005[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Dutilh, G., & Sarafoglou, A. (2018). The Creativity-Verification Cycle in Psychological Science: New Methods to Combat Old Idols. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618771357[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., ... Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., ... Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3[details]
van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian Inference for Kendall's Rank Correlation Coefficient. American Statistician, 72(4), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1264998[details]
2017
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Pedroni, A., Frey, R., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). A test of the diffusion model explanation for the worst performance rule using preregistration and blinding. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(3), 713-725. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1304-y[details]
Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). J. B. S. Haldane's contribution to the bayes factor hypothesis test. Statistical Science, 32(2), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS599[details]
Evans, N. J., Hawkins, G. E., Boehm, U., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Brown, S. D. (2017). The computations that support simple decision-making: A comparison between the diffusion and urgency-gating models. Scientific Reports, 7, [16433]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16694-7[details]
Forstmeier, W., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Parker, T. H. (2017). Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings: A practical guide. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 92(4), 1941–1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12315[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Duizer, M., Bakker, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Bayesian mixture modeling of significant p values: A meta-analytic method to estimate the degree of contamination from H0. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 146(9), 1223-1233. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000324[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Sarafoglou, A., Matzke, D., Ly, A., Boehm, U., Marsman, M., ... Steingroever, H. (2017). A tutorial on bridge sampling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.005[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Van Erp, S., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: the case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760[details]
Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 638-652. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8[details]
Jamil, T., Marsman, M., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). What Are the Odds? Modern Relevance and Bayes Factor Solutions for MacAlister’s Problem From the 1881 Educational Times. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(5), 819-830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416667980[details]
Ly, A., Marsman, M., Verhagen, J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E-M. (2017). A tutorial on Fisher information. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 80, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.05.006[details]
Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Three insights from a Bayesian interpretation of the one-sided P value. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(3), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416669201[details]
Matzke, D., Ly, A., Selker, R., Weeda, W. D., Scheibehenne, B., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Bayesian inference for correlations in the presence of measurement error and estimation uncertainty. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), [25]. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.78[details]
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie Du Sert, N., ... Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), [0021]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021[details]
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Swagman, A. R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2017). Bayesian analysis of factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 304-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000057[details]
Scheibehenne, B., Gronau, Q. F., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Fixed or Random? A Resolution Through Model Averaging: Reply to Carlsson, Schimmack, Williams, and Bürkner (2017). Psychological Science, 28(11), 1698-1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617724426[details]
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential Hypothesis Testing With Bayes Factors: Efficiently Testing Mean Differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2017). The need for Bayesian hypothesis testing in psychological science. In S. O. Lilienfeld, & I. D. Waldman (Eds.), Psychological Science under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions (pp. 123-138). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119095910.ch8[details]
van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Can the experimental study of religion be advanced using a Bayesian predictive framework? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 331-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249915[details]
van Erp, S., Verhagen, J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Estimates of Between-Study Heterogeneity for 705 Meta-Analyses Reported in Psychological Bulletin From 1990–2013. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 5(1), [4]. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.33[details]
Boehm, U., Hawkins, G. E., Brown, S., van Rijn, H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Of monkeys and men: Impatience in perceptual decision-making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 738-749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0958-5[details]
Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Challenges in replicating brain-behavior correlations: Rejoinder to Kanai (2015) and Muhlert and Ridgway (2015). Cortex, 74, 348-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.018[details]
Cramer, A. O. J., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 640-647. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0913-5[details]
Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Newell, B. R., Zeelenberg, R., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2016). Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145(12), e81-e95. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000067[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645[details]
Heck, D. W., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Adjusted priors for Bayes factors involving reparameterized order constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.004[details]
Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). An evaluation of alternative methods for testing hypotheses, from the perspective of Harold Jeffreys. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.003[details]
Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.06.004[details]
Monden, R., de Vos, S., Morey, R., Wagenmakers, E-J., de Jonge, P., & Roest, A. M. (2016). Toward evidence-based medical statistics: A Bayesian analysis of double-blind placebo-controlled antidepressant trials in the treatment of anxiety disorders. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25(4), 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1507[details]
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), [150547]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547[details]
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Continued misinterpretation of confidence intervals: Response to Miller and Ulrich. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0955-8[details]
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8[details]
Morey, R. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Rouder, J. N. (2016). Calibrated Bayes Factors Should Not Be Used: A Reply to Hoijtink, van Kooten, and Hulsker. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1052710[details]
Mulder, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Editors’ introduction to the special issue “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.002[details]
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). The interplay between subjectivity, statistical practice, and psychological science. Collabra, 2, [6]. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.28[details]
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Province, J. M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Is there a free lunch in inference? Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(3), 520-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12214[details]
Scheibehenne, B., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Can Reconcile Seemingly Inconsistent Results: The Case of Hotel Towel Reuse. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1043-1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644081[details]
Schweinsberg, M., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Sommer, S. A., Jordan, J., Tierney, W., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Bayes factors for reinforcement-learning models of the Iowa Gambling Task. Decision, 3(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000040[details]
Tierney, W., Schweinsberg, M., Jordan, J., Kennedy, D. M., Qureshi, I., Sommer, S. A., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects. Scientific Data, 3, [160082]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.82[details]
Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). C. S. Peirce on the Crisis of Confidence and the “No More Bets” Heuristic. The Winnower, 3, [e146611.14253]. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.146611.14253[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., & Busato, V. (2016). De verleidingen van foponderzoek. Skepter, 29(4), 24-28. [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Beek, T., Dijkhoff, L., Gronau, Q. F., Acosta, A., Adams, R. B., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616674458[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Morey, R. D., & Lee, M. D. (2016). Bayesian Benefits for the Pragmatic Researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416643289[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Verhagen, J., & Ly, A. (2016). How to quantify the evidence for the absence of a correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 48(2), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0593-0[details]
Wetzels, R., Tutschkow, D., Dolan, C., van der Sluis, S., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). A Bayesian test for the hot hand phenomenon. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.12.003[details]
van Maanen, L., Forstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Heathcote, A. (2016). The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0563-6[details]
Aarts, A. A., et al., U., Borsboom, D., Columbus, S., den Bezemer, B., Deserno, M. K., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 943. [aac4716]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716[details]
Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., Grasman, R., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). An introduction to Bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management, 41(2), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314560412[details]
Boekel, W., Wagenmakers, E-J., Belay, L., Verhagen, J., Brown, S., & Forstmann, B. U. (2015). A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations. Cortex, 66, 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.019[details]
Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Model-based cognitive neuroscience: a conceptual introduction. In B. U. Forstmann, & E-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. 139-156). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_7[details]
Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Preface. In B. U. Forstmann, & E-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. v-vi). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9[details]
Hawkins, G. E., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Revisiting the evidence of collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(6), 2476-2484. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2410-14.2015[details]
Hawkins, G. E., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00088.2015[details]
Heathcote, A., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). An introduction to good practices in cognitive modeling. In B. U. Forstmann, & E-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. 25-48). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_2[details]
Heck, D. W., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Morey, R. D. (2015). Testing order constraints: Qualitative differences between Bayes factors and normalized maximum likelihood. Statistics & Probability Letters, 105, 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2015.06.014[details]
Krypotos, A-M., Beckers, T., Kindt, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). A Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model decomposition of performance in approach-avoidance tasks. Cognition & Emotion, 29(8), 1424-1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.985635[details]
Lee, M. D., Lodewyckx, T., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Three Bayesian analyses of memory deficits in patients with dissociative identity disorder. In J. G. W. Raaijmakers, A. H. Criss, R. L. Goldstone, R. M. Nosofsky, & M. Steyvers (Eds.), Cognitive modeling in perception and memory: a festschrift for Richard M. Shiffrin (pp. 189-200). (Psychology Press festschrifts). New York/London: Psychology Press. [details]
Love, J., Selker, R., Verhagen, J., Marsman, M., Gronau, Q. F., Jamil, T., ... Rouder, J. N. (2015). Software to sharpen your stats. APS Observer, 28(3), 27-29. [details]
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Batchelder, W. H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Bayesian estimation of multinomial processing tree models with heterogeneity in participants and items. Psychometrika, 80(1), 205-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9374-9[details]
Matzke, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van Rijn, H., Slagter, H. A., van der Molen, M. W., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: A preregistered adversarial collaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 144(1), e1-e15. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000038[details]
Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E-J., & van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(1), 1-17. [details]
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., ... Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422-1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374[details]
Nuijten, M. B., Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for mediation. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0470-2[details]
Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Koch, G., van Aalst, C., Pinto, Y., Matzke, D., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). On the automatic link between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [335]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00335[details]
Steingroever, H., Fridberg, D., Horstmann, A., Kjome, K., Kumari, V., Lane, S. D., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Data from 617 healthy participants performing the Iowa gambling task: A "many labs" collaboration. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 3(1), [e5]. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.ak[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). ŵ=.2, â=.8, ĉ=.6: So what? On the meaning of parameter estimates from reinforcement-learning models. Decision, 2(3), 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000034[details]
Terry, A., Marley, A. A. J., Barnwal, A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Generalising the drift rate distribution for linear ballistic accumulators. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 68-69, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.09.002[details]
Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. In J. R. Busemeyer, Z. Wang, J. T. Townsend, & A. Eidels (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology (pp. 300-319). (Oxford library of psychology). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Beek, T. F., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., ... Pinto, Y. (2015). Turning the hands of time again: a purely confirmatory replication study and a Bayesian analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [494]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00494[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Bakker, M., Lee, M. D., Matzke, D., ... Morey, R. D. (2015). A power fallacy. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 913-917. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0517-4[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., Kievit, R. A., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2015). A skeptical eye on psi. In E. May, & S. B. Marwaha (Eds.), Extrasensory perception: support, skepticism, and science (pp. 153-176). Praeger. [details]
van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q. F., Guan, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [1365]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365[details]
Heathcote, A., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Brown, S. D. (2014). The falsifiability of actual decision-making models. Psychological Review, 121(4), 676-678. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037771[details]
Hoekstra, R., Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1157-1164. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3[details]
Logan, G. D., van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control. Psychological Review, 121(1), 66-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035230[details]
Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Simple relation between Bayesian order-restricted and point-null hypothesis tests. Statistics & Probability Letters, 92, 121-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2014.05.010[details]
Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: A comment on Cumming (2014). Psychological Science, 25(6), 1289-1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614525969[details]
Munafò, M., Noble, S., Browne, W. J., Brunner, D., Button, K., Ferreira, J., ... Blumenstein, R. (2014). Scientific rigor and the art of motorcycle maintenance. Nature Biotechnology, 32(9), 871-873. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3004[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Absolute performance of reinforcement-learning models for the Iowa Gambling Task. Decision, 1(3), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000005[details]
Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Bayesian tests to quantify the result of a replication attempt. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(4), 1457-1475. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036731[details]
Winkel, J., Keuken, M. C., van Maanen, L., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Forstmann, B. U. (2014). Early evidence affects later decisions: Why evidence accumulation is required to explain response time data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0551-8[details]
Zhang, S., Lee, M. D., Vandekerckhove, J., Maris, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, [1364]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01364[details]
de Groot, A. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Borsboom, D., Verhagen, J., Kievit, R., Bakker, M., Cramer, A., Matzke, D., Mellenbergh, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2014). The meaning of "significance" for different types of research. Acta Psychologica, 148, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001[details]
de Hollander, G., Wagenmakers, E-J., Waldorp, L., & Forstmann, B. (2014). An antidote to the imager's fallacy, or how to identify brain areas that are in limbo. PLoS ONE, 9(12), [e115700]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115700[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Action video games do not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(5), 1794-1805. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036923[details]
2013
Dutilh, G., Forstmann, B., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). A diffusion model account of age differences in post-error slowing. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029875[details]
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Logan, G. D., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(4), 1047-1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030543[details]
Matzke, D., Love, J., Wiecki, T. V., Brown, S. D., Logan, G. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Release the BEESTS: Bayesian Estimation of Ex-Gaussian STop-Signal reaction time distributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, [918]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00918[details]
Mulder, M. J., Keuken, M. C., van Maanen, L., Boekel, W. E., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75(5), 1048-1058. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0447-8[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). A comparison of reinforcement learning models for the Iowa Gambling Task using parameter space partitioning. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(2), 2. [2]. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1150[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Validating the PVL-Delta model for the Iowa gambling task. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, [898]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00898[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Horstmann, A., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029929[details]
Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Brown, S. D., Sederberg, P. B., & Steyvers, M. (2013). A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data. NeuroImage, 72, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.048[details]
2012
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(2), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2[details]
Dutilh, G., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van der Maas, H. L. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). How to measure post-error slowing: A confound and a simple solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(3), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.04.001[details]
Dyjas, O., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wetzels, R., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). What's in a name: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the name-letter effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, [334]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00334[details]
Hawkins, G. E., Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). An optimal adjustment procedure to minimize experiment time in decisions with multiple alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 339-348. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0216-z[details]
Hawkins, G., Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Context effects in multi-alternative decision making: Empirical data and a Bayesian model. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 498-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01221.x[details]
Hawkins, G., Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Decision speed induces context effects in choice. Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000145[details]
Ho, T., Brown, S., van Maanen, L., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Serences, J. T. (2012). The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(23), 7992-8003. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-12.2012[details]
Huizenga, H. M., Wetzels, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Four empirical tests of Unconscious Thought Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 332-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.010[details]
Mulder, M. J., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., Boekel, W., & Forstmann, B. U. (2012). Bias in the brain: A diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(7), 2335-2343. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-11.2012[details]
Ortega, A., Wagenmakers, E-J., Lee, M. D., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2012). A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in the assessment of malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 453-465. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs038[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Krypotos, A-M., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2012). On the interpretation of removable interactions: a survey of the field 33 years after Loftus. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Farrell, S. (2012). Abstract concepts require concrete models: Why cognitive scientists have not yet embraced nonlinearly coupled, dynamical, self-organized critical, synergistic, scale-free, exquisitely context-sensitive, interaction-dominant, multifractal, interdependent brain-body-niche systems. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01164.x[details]
Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1057-1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x[details]
van Maanen, L., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Piéron's law and optimal behavior in perceptual decision-making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, [143]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00143[details]
van Maanen, L., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Forstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(4), 739-753. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0267-7[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making. Psychopharmacology, 219(4), 1017-1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2435-9[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Mulder, M. J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Do the dynamics of prior information depend on task context? An analysis of optimal performance and an empirical test. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, [132]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00132[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models. Psychological Review, 119(1), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026275[details]
2011
Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0022-4[details]
Dutilh, G., Krypotos, A-M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice: a diffusion model account. Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 434-442. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000111[details]
Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E-J., Visser, I., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). A phase transition model for the speed-accuracy trade-off in response time experiments. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01147.x[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., Derrfuss, J., Imperati, D., & Brown, S. (2011). The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: a structural model-based approach. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 17242-17249. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0309-11.2011[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Eichele, T., Brown, S., & Serences, J. T. (2011). Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.002[details]
Lodewyckx, T., Kim, W., Lee, M. D., Tuerlinckx, F., Kuppens, P., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). A tutorial on Bayes factor estimation with the product space method. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(5), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2011.06.001[details]
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105-1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886[details]
Stringer, S., Borsboom, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Bayesian inference for the information gain model. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0057-5[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790[details]
Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: an empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406923[details]
van Maanen, L., Brown, S. D., Eichele, T., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ho, T., Serences, J., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011). Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(48), 17488-17495. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-11.2011[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Brown, S., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). An integrated perspective on the relation between response speed and intelligence. Cognition, 119(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.002[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Cognitive model decomposition of the BART: assessment and application. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.010[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Does the Name-Race Implicit Association Test measure racial prejudice? Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000093[details]
2010
Bogacz, R., Wagenmakers, E. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences, 33(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Anwander, A., Schäfer, A., Neumann, J., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E. M., ... Turner, R. (2010). Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(36), 15916-15920. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004932107[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Brown, S., Dutilh, G., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). The neural substrate of prior information in perceptual decision making: a model-based analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, [40]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00040[details]
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Eidels, A. (2010). Distribution-free tests of stochastic dominance for small samples. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(5), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.005[details]
Iverson, G. J., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). The random effects prep continues to mispredict the probability of replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.270[details]
Iverson, G. J., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Lee, M. D. (2010). A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of prep. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017182[details]
Jepma, M., te Beek, E. T., Wagenmakers, E-J., van Gerven, J. M. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The role of the noradrenergic system in the exploration-exploitation trade-off: a psychopharmacological study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, [170]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00170[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60(3), 158-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001[details]
Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). Exemplary introduction to Bayesian statistical inference [Review of: I. Ntzoufras (2009) Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(5), 466-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.02.002[details]
Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54(9), 2094-2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.03.016[details]
Wetzels, R., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). Bayesian inference using WBDev: a tutorial for social scientists. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 884-897. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.884[details]
Wetzels, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). Bayesian parameter estimation in the Expectancy Valence model of the Iowa gamblling task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.12.001[details]
2009
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1026-1036. https://doi.org/10.3758/16.6.1026[details]
Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wagenmakers, E-J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2009). On the mean and variance of response times under the diffusion model with an application to parameter estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.01.006[details]
Grasman, R. P. P. P., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). Fitting the cusp catastrophe in R: a cusp-package primer. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(8), 1-28. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v32/i08/paper[details]
Iverson, G., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). prep misestimates the probability of replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.424[details]
Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Band, G. P. H., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 847-864. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21063[details]
Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 798-817. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.798[details]
Steyvers, M., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). A Bayesian analysis of human decision-making on bandit problems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(3), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.11.002[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 641-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802205067[details]
Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: a flexible winBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t-test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 752-760. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.752[details]
2008
Ahn, W-Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Stout, J. C. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32, 1376-1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802352992[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2008). Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17538-17542. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805903105[details]
Shiffrin, R. M., Lee, M. D., Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802414826[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(1), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2008). EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1229-1235. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1229[details]
2020
Hutton, J. L., Diggle, P. J., Bird, S. M., Hennig, C., Longford, N., Mathur, M. B., Vander Weele, T. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Chai, C. P., Dowe, D. L., Ferguson, J., Fitz-Simon, N., Friede, T., Rover, C., Grieve, A. P., Kumar, K., Ly, A., Mansmann, U., Mateu, J., ... Held, L. (2020). Discussion on the meeting on ‘Signs and sizes: understanding and replicating statistical findings’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 183(2), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12544[details]
2019
Haaf, J. M., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Retire significance, but still test hypotheses. Nature, 567(7749), 461. [details]
2018
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., ... Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
2017
Keuken, M. C., Ly, A., Boekel, W. E., Wagenmakers, E. M., Belay, L., Verhagen, A. J., ... Forstmann, B. U. (2017). Corrigendum A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations. Cortex, 93, 229-233.
Keuken, M. C., Ly, A., Boekel, W., Wagenmakers, E. J., Belay, L., Verhagen, J., Brown, S. D., & Forstmann, B. U. (2017). Corrigendum to “A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations” [Cortex 66 (2015) 115–133] (S0010945215000155) (10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.019). Cortex, 93, 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.007
Bakker, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Matzke, D., Kievit, R. A., van der Maas, H. L. J., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Dwelling on the past. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 120-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1920[details]
Bakker, M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Borsboom, D., Wicherts, J., & van der Maas, H. (2013). Spelregels in de psychologie: over eerlijk en goed onderzoek. De Psycholoog, 48(12), 68-76. [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Sjoemelwetenschap. De Psycholoog, 48(4), 34-35. [details]
2011
Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Romeijn, J-W. (2011). Mechanistic curiosity will not kill the Bayesian cat. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 192-193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000215[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Kleren voor de keizer [Bespreking van: R. van de Schoot (2010) Informative hypotheses: how to move beyond classical null hypothesis testing]. De Psycholoog, 46(1), 21-22. [details]
2009
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). How do individuals reason in the Wason card selection task [Review of: M. Oaksford, N. Chater (2007) Bayesian rationality: the probabilistic approach to human reasoning]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 104-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000508[details]
2008
Wagenmakers, E-J., Lee, M. D., Lodewyckx, T., & Iverson, G. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. A. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (pp. 181-207). (Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4_9[details]
2019
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Het belang van Brady versus Maryland voor de psychologie. De Psycholoog, 54(12), 24-28. https://osf.io/6w4zn/[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Prins op een missie: [Boekbespreking van: C. Chambers (2018) De 7 doodzonden van de psychologie: pleidooi voor een cultuuromslag in de wetenschappelijke praktijk]. De Psycholoog, 54(3), 28-29. https://osf.io/uvw83/[details]
2016
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). [Review of: R.B. Kline (2013) Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences]. American Statistician, 70(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1185863[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., & Dutilh, G. (2016). Preregistration: Why, what, where? Psychology Research Institute of the University of Amsterdam.
2013
Borsboom, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Derailed: the rise and fall of Diederik Stapel [Review of: D. Stapel (2012) Ontsporing]. APS Observer, 26(1). [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., & van der Maas, H. (2008). [Review of: A.R. Jensen (2006) Clocking the mind: mental chronometry and individual differences]. Intelligence, 36(5), 493-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.001[details]
2017
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Het zwaard van Alhazen. Skepter, 30, 34-35.
2011
Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Kievit, R. A., Wetzels, R., van den Berg, H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). Universiteiten en subsidieverstrekkers moeten fraude aanpakken. De Volkskrant.
Kievit, R. A., Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Wicherts, J. M., Wetzels, R., van Harmelen, A-L., & van den Berg, H. (2011). Maatregel om fraude te bemoeilijken brengt enkel voordelen met zich mee. De Volkskrant.
2017
Ly, A., Raj, A., Wagenmakers, E. M., & Marsman, M. (2017). A limit-consistent Bayes factor for testing the equality of two Poisson rates. Poster session presented at International Workshop on Objective Bayes Methodology, Austin, United States.
2015
Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Jeffrey's Correlation Test Based on Criteria of Bayarri, Berger, Forte, and Garcia-Donato (2012). Poster session presented at 11th International Workshop on Objective Bayes Methodology, .
Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2015). Jeffreys’s Correlation Test Based on Criteria of Bayarri, Berger, Forte, and Garcia-Donato (2012). Poster session presented at Objective Bayesian Analysis, Valencia, Spain.
Award
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2018). Verbindingsprijs.
Wagenmakers, E. M. & Stefan, A. M. (2018). MaGW research talent (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. & Kucharsky, S. (2018). MaGW research talent (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Advanced Grant from the European Research Council (ERC).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). VICI grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). PhD grant from NWO.
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Dynamic adjustment of response caution in perceptual decision-making..
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Partner investigator on the Australian Research Council three-year project "Rapid Decisions: From Neuroscience to Complex Cognitions".
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Partner investigator on the Australian Research Council three-year project "Cognitive Flexibility from Adolescence to Senescence: Variability Associated with Cognitive Strategy and Brain Connectivity"..
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Inaugural recipient of the Newcastle Psychology Research Visitor Fellowship..
Membership
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Member of the committee on Replication Research (“Replicatieonderzoek”) organized by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), KNAW.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Member of Advisory Board, PsychFileDrawer.org project.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2016-2017). Member of the committee on Replication Research (“Replicatieonderzoek”) organized by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), (…), KNAW.
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). Keynote: Bayesian model selection in sensometrics., the 10th Conference on Sensometrics, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, July 2010..
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). Subsidie: The "ALW open competition" postdoc project "The neural basis of decision-making with multiple choice alternatives" was awarded a three-year (…), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (15-10-2018). Bayesian inference without tears, Centre International de Rencontres Mathematiques (CIRM).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (1-9-2018). Bayesian advantages for the pragmatic researcher, Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Frankfurt.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (30-4-2018). Tip of the iceberg? Revealing hidden uncertainty in cognitive modeling, h-MPT Network Meeting, Mannheim.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (20-4-2018). Bayesian inference with JASP, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience NIN - KNAW.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-4-2018). The case for radical transparency in statistical reporting, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (1-4-2018). Bayesian statistics using JASP, VU, Amsterdam.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (20-1-2018). The case for radical transparency in statistical reporting., Replication and Reproducibility Event II: Moving Psychological Science Forward , Londen.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (12-2017). Barbecue chicken alert!, BITTS.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (11-2017). An introduction to JASP, Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam (ONWAR) .
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (11-2017). Hidden pseudoscience: Ailment, diagnosis, and cure, Amsterdam Skeptics in the Pub.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-2017). The case for radical transparency in statistical reporting, ASA, American Sociological Association.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-2017). The why and how of testing a point-null hypothesis within a Bayesian framework, TU Delft.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-2017). Redefine statistical significance with JASP, IMC.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (9-2017). JASP/Evidence, BITTS.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (9-2017). “JASP Training Course”, 20th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (9-2017). Bayesian statistics without tears, Oxford University.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (6-2017). The maximum diagnosticity of the p-value, workshop “Is there a future without null hypothesis significance testing?”.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (6-2017). History and statistical foundation of preregistration, Tilburg University.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (5-2017). “Bayesian Inference with JASP: A Fresh Way to Do Statistics", 29th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (4-2017). “JASP: A Fresh Way to do Statistics”, BBSRC STARS Course “Advanced Methods for Reproducible Science”.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (3-2017). “Bayesian Inference in Theory and Practice: A JASP Workshop”, Philips Research.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2-2017). “A personal perspective on the analysis of neuroscience data”, 6th Berlin Winter School on Ethics and Neuroscience.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2017). The methodological metamorphosis of neuroscience, 6th Berlin Winter School on Ethics and Neuroscience.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2017). KNAW report: Replication studies, NAS.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2017). “Bayesian analysis with JASP: A fresh way to do statistics”, Max Planck School for Language Sciences.
Others
van Doorn, J. (organiser), Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser) & Sarafoglou, A. (organiser) (26-8-2019 - 30-8-2019). Ninth Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
van Doorn, J. (organiser), Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Sarafoglou, A. (organiser) & Morey, R. D. (organiser) (22-8-2019 - 23-8-2019). Theory and Practice of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Matzke, D. (organiser), Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser) & Tuerlinckx, F. (organiser) (25-3-2019 - 29-3-2019). Erasmus Seminar on Mathematical Psychology: “Formal Models and Quantitative Methods for Psychology” (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Lee, M. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser) & Gronau, Q. F. (organiser) (20-8-2018 - 24-8-2018). Eight Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Gronau, Q. F. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser) & Matzke, D. (organiser) (28-8-2017 - 29-8-2017). Theory and Practice of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A JASP Workshop (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), Gronau, Q. F. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser) & Lee, M. (organiser) (21-8-2017 - 25-8-2017). Seventh Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (participant) (2017). Fellow for the Association for Psychological Science (other).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (consultant) (2017). Statistical consulting, CHDI Foundation (consultancy).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Selker, R. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (2016). Theory and Practice of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A JASP Workshop (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Selker, R. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser), Steingröver, H. M. (organiser), Lee, M. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (2016). Sixth Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Tuerlinckx, F. (organiser) & Matzke, D. (organiser) (22-3-2015 - 28-3-2015). Erasmus-IP Seminar on Mathematical Psychology, Debrecen. Formal Models and Quantitative Methods for Psychology. (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (2015). First Annual JASP Workhop: A Fresh Way to do Bayesian Statistics., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Lee, M. D. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser) & Matzke, D. (organiser) (2015). Fifth Annual WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Lee, M. D. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Steingroever, H. (organiser) & Verhagen, A. J. (organiser) (11-8-2014 - 15-8-2014). Fourth Annual WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Steingröver, H. M. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (12-8-2013 - 16-8-2013). WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Steingröver, H. M. (organiser) & Lee, M. (organiser) (2-7-2012 - 6-7-2012). Organisation of the workshop "Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science"., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser) & Forstmann, B. U. (organiser) (2012). Organisation of the Academy Colloquium "New Insights from Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience", Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Wetzels, R. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser) & Lee, M. (organiser) (22-8-2011). Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
2017
Steingröver, H. M. (2017). Safe models for risky decisions. [details]
Evans, N. J., Tillman, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Systematic and random sources of variability in perceptual decision-making: Comment on Ratcliff, Voskuilen, and McKoon (2018). (Version 1 ed.) PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j98qd[details]
The UvA website uses cookies and similar technologies to ensure the basic functionality of the site and for statistical and optimisation purposes. It also uses cookies to display content such as YouTube videos and for marketing purposes. This last category consists of tracking cookies: these make it possible for your online behaviour to be tracked. You consent to this by clicking on Accept. Also read our Privacy statement
Necessary
Cookies that are essential for the basic functioning of the website. These cookies are used to enable students and staff to log in to the site, for example.
Necessary & Optimalisation
Cookies that collect information about visitor behaviour anonymously to help make the website work more effectively.
Necessary & Optimalisation & Marketing
Cookies that make it possible to track visitors and show them personalised adverts. These are used by third-party advertisers to gather data about online behaviour. To watch Youtube videos you need to enable this category.